🖨 Rendering flow¶

Status: reference. Written 2026-08-24. Updated 2026-08-26.

How python -m chitragupta.draft render turns a draft into .md/.tex/.pdf/.docx, where a rendered draft's bibliography actually comes from, and what happens to a figure on the way through.

Written for someone changing chitragupta/render_output/, or trying to work out -- for a specific rendered file -- which of several places on disk its bibliography or its figure actually came from. Assumed you have read ARCHITECTURE.md's drafting layer. Not covered here: every render flag (CLI.md), the TikZ style rules a figure is held to (TIKZ-STYLE.md), and book assembly's own citeproc pass over a composed book (BOOKS.md).

🧭 Table of contents¶

The two paths through render()
Citation resolution: --citeproc is the only mode there is
Mathematics: substituted on the pandoc path only
Four places a rendered bibliography can live
The manual References section, and why citeproc replaces it
Figure substitution: four combinations, one real no-op
Figure numbering: a caption wraps the marker, in two passes
Table numbering: four cases, and pandoc numbers in only one
Equation numbering: the one pass that reads what _math left behind
Known defect: the fourth combination isn't a no-op on this host
Unbuilt: a natbib-style mode for thesis fragments

🔀 The two paths through `render()`¶

render() (chitragupta/render_output/__init__.py) takes one of two routes, decided by output_format and the draft's own suffix:

--format md on a Markdown draft never reaches pandoc. This is a citation-numbering job, not a format conversion -- references.write_numbered renumbers [@key] markers and appends an IEEE list in place, because pandoc's own Markdown writer would escape every marker to \[1\] and wrap the bibliography in {#refs} fenced divs that render as literal punctuation anywhere that isn't pandoc.
Every other combination goes through pandoc -- --citeproc against config.BIB_FILE_PATH, the vendored IEEE CSL style, and (for pdf) pdflatex. This is the path the rest of this document is about, including a .tex fragment rendered to .md: converting \citep{...} to Markdown is a real format conversion, so it does not qualify for the first bullet's shortcut.

Output always lands mirrored under content/rendered/: a draft at content/drafts/<topic>/<name>.tex renders to content/rendered/<topic>/<name>.{md,pdf,...}.

📚 Citation resolution: `--citeproc` is the only mode there is¶

Every genre-skill draft cites with Pandoc-style [@citekey] markers (or, for thesis-chapter-writer's .tex fragment, \citep{citekey}/ \citet{citekey}). _pandoc_command always passes --citeproc --bibliography <bib> --csl <ieee.csl> -- there is no flag or code path that renders a citation any other way. Two fixups run first, on temp copies only (_safe_render_inputs, chitragupta/render_output/_citeproc.py): aliasing a citekey containing -- (pandoc's tokenizer truncates it mid-key otherwise, silently dropping the citation), and stripping control characters / folding math-alphanumeric Unicode that content/parsed/ text can carry and pdflatex cannot. Neither the draft nor papers/bibliography.bib is ever written to.

🔢 Mathematics: substituted on the pandoc path only¶

chitragupta/render_output/_math.py runs on the same temp copy, between the figure swap and _safe_render_inputs, and turns a draft's ASCII into mathematics pandoc can read -- `tau` into $\tau$ , and a  fence into $$…$$ -- using the ASCII-to-LaTeX table in the dossier's math.md (DOSSIER.md, WRITING-STANDARDS.md §12).

It turns on the same predicate as the two paths above: a render that reaches pandoc gets the substitution, and --format md -- which does not -- is a byte-perfect no-op, which is the whole reason the LaTeX lives outside the draft. A span with no row is left exactly as it was, so as_of stays \texttt{as\_of} by construction rather than by heuristic.

It writes $…$ , never $…$. Pandoc's Markdown reader does not read $…$ as mathematics: handed A $k = 4$ and B $k = 4$ it emits A $k = 4$ and B (k = 4), silently dropping the second one's backslashes. $…$ is the native inline form, and each writer then renders it in its own idiom -- which is what makes the output format-native rather than LaTeX-shaped.

Two conditions fail the render rather than warning, because both mean the pdf would carry verbatim text where the author said an equation goes: a  marker with no row, and one with no math.md at all. The second is what renaming a draft looks like -- a dossier is found by path alone. Heuristic gaps print [math] warnings and carry on.

🗂 Four places a rendered bibliography can live¶

A render's citations don't resolve against a single file; four different stores are involved, and confusing one for another -- only one of them is this pipeline's own -- is the easiest way to misread what a rendered draft actually proves:

What	Where	Who reads it
The bibliographic data	`papers/bibliography.bib` -- `config.BIB_FILE_PATH` (`chitragupta/config.py:221`), your own Zotero/JabRef export	pandoc's `--citeproc`, at render time only
The verification record	`content/ledger.sqlite`	`python -m chitragupta.draft gate`, `references.py`, retrieval -- never the render itself
The rendered bibliography	generated fresh into `content/rendered/...` on every render	a preview artefact; nothing downstream reads it back
The real bibliography, for a `.tex` fragment specifically	your own thesis's `\bibliography{...}`/biblatex resource, outside this repository entirely	your own `pdflatex`+`bibtex` run, at submission

The fourth row only applies to thesis-chapter-writer's output. Every other genre's rendered draft is the bibliography-bearing artefact -- its citeproc-built reference list is the one a reader sees. A .tex fragment's \citep{doe_x_2024} is deliberately left for the surrounding thesis to resolve: \inputed into your own document, your own \bibliography{}/biblatex run numbers it consistently with your other chapters. The .md/.pdf preview this pipeline renders from that same fragment (--format md/--format pdf, both run by thesis-chapter-writer step 11) still goes through row three -- citeproc against papers/bibliography.bib -- because a preview has to resolve citations to be readable at all. That preview is not the deliverable and nothing downstream reads it back; the fragment on disk, unresolved \citep{} markers and all, is.

📄 The manual References section, and why citeproc replaces it¶

Four of the five prose genres run python -m chitragupta.draft references <draft> after the gate, which writes a citekey-labelled ## References section built from exactly the citekeys the draft cites (references.py:90's section_start finds it by heading text). At render time, _swap_manual_refs_for_citeproc (chitragupta/render_output/_citeproc.py:142) replaces that section's entries with pandoc's own placement anchor ({#refs}\n:::\n) while keeping the heading -- so citeproc's bibliography, which is the one numbered consistently with the inline markers and the one with authors and venues in it, lands under the draft's own heading instead of a second, untitled list appearing at the end.

thesis-chapter-writer skips the references step entirely (ARCHITECTURE.md:192) -- both by design, and mechanically it could not run anyway: references.py:529's CLI takes "Path to the draft file (Markdown)", and section_start scans for a Markdown heading a .tex fragment never has. Because the fragment carries no ## References section, section_start returns None and _swap_manual_refs_for_citeproc returns the text unchanged -- the function is citeproc-specific by construction, but it is harmless for a genre that never reaches the case it exists to fix, rather than needing its own exemption.

🖼 Figure substitution: four combinations, one real no-op¶

_with_figures_for (chitragupta/render_output/_figures.py:324) switches every figure marker to the form the target format can draw, one of four ways depending on the draft's own kind and whether the output is LaTeX-bound (tex/latex/pdf):

Draft carries	Output wants	What happens
Markdown `figure:` marker + ASCII twin	LaTeX-bound	`_substitute_tikz_for_ascii`: marker becomes `\input{figures/<name>.tex}`
Markdown `figure:` marker + ASCII twin	non-LaTeX	`_substitute_ascii_for_marker`: marker becomes a fenced ASCII block
`.tex` fragment's inline `\input` + ASCII twin	non-LaTeX (`.md` preview)	`_substitute_ascii_for_tikz`: `\input{...}` becomes a `\begin{verbatim}` block of the ASCII twin
`.tex` fragment's inline `\input`	LaTeX-bound (`tex`/`pdf`)	documented no-op -- the TikZ is real and already inline, so nothing is substituted

The third row exists because pandoc's LaTeX reader "resolves the \input but then drops the tikzpicture environment, and keeps dropping it under -t markdown+raw_attribute" (_substitute_ascii_for_tikz's own docstring) -- so without the swap, a .tex fragment's figure would silently vanish from its own .md preview.

Two consequences of that table worth stating outright, because both surprise people who have only read the code:

Nothing here adds a figure float or a \caption. The substitution is a bare \input, so a captioned, numbered figure is one whose figure file carries the float -- WRITING-STANDARDS.md §10.
Only tex/latex/pdf ever draw the TikZ. md, html and docx all take row two and render the ASCII twin, which is why a panelled figure's (a)/(b) sub-captions have to exist in the .txt as well as in the picture: for three of the five formats the twin is the only thing the reader sees.

🔢 Figure numbering: a caption wraps the marker, in two passes¶

Issue 411 gives a captioned figure the same "author writes no number" contract §13 gives a table, via chitragupta/render_output/_figure_captions.py -- a sibling of _figures.py, not a part of it, split out once the combined module crossed docs/CODE-STANDARDS.md's 250-code-line ratchet.

The Markdown contract is a figure: marker followed directly by its caption, no blank line between (_FIGURE_CAPTION_PAIR_RE):

<!-- figure: figures/delivery-modes -->
One reading path under three delivery modes.

Two passes run before _with_figures_for's own substitution, in _substituted (chitragupta/render_output/_substitution.py), because both read figures() off the original [marker, caption] text -- after _with_figures_for replaces the marker with real content, that adjacency is gone:

Pass	What it resolves	LaTeX-bound (`tex`/`latex`/`pdf`)	Everything else
`substitute_captions`	The `[marker, caption]` pair	Wraps the untouched marker in a `\begin{figure}`/`\end{figure}` pair, each its own raw ```{=latex} block -- LaTeX's own counter numbers it, no `\thefigure` override ever written. The caption stays pandoc-visible text, with only `\caption{`{=latex} and `}\label{fig:<id>}`{=latex} injected around it as raw-attribute spans, so a caption's own `[@key]`, `&` or `%` is Markdown-processed and LaTeX-escaped like any other prose rather than landing raw inside `\caption{...}` (issue 494)	`<marker>\nFigure N: <caption>`, N counted in document order among captioned figures only
`substitute_refs`	An inline `<!-- figureref: <id> -->`	`Figure~\ref{fig:<id>}`{=latex} -- the same raw-attribute-span reason `_tables._reference_for` needs for `~`	`Figure N`

Why \begin{figure} and \end{figure} cannot share one raw block with the caption between them. Pandoc's raw-TeX passthrough reads a bare \begin{env}...\end{env} span -- the same mechanism \input{...} markers rely on elsewhere in this file -- as one opaque block, copied to the writer byte-identical and never Markdown-processed. An earlier revision interpolated the caption straight into such a span, which is exactly why it was neither Markdown-processed nor LaTeX-escaped: a caption's & broke pdflatex, a % silently truncated the rest of the line (the \label included), and a caption's own [@key] reached the PDF as literal, unresolved text. Splitting \begin{figure}/\end{figure} into two explicit fenced raw blocks, with the caption as ordinary pandoc content between them, is what lets the caption go through the Markdown reader at all -- the same fix shape _tables._caption_for already had, one row up, because a table's caption was never trapped inside a hand-written raw environment in the first place.

An uncaptioned marker matches neither pass's regex and renders exactly as "Figure substitution" above already describes -- no float, no number, no \label. A figureref naming an uncaptioned figure's id, or one no figure declares at all, is left exactly as written; python -m chitragupta.draft style (chitragupta/style_figures.py) is what reports it, not a failed render.

The .tex fragment (thesis-chapter-writer) carries neither marker and is untouched by either pass -- it hand-authors a real \begin{figure} inline, the same carve-out the table section below states for a \begin{table}. The only change there is one line removed: \renewcommand{\thefigure}{N.M} is no longer written, so the user's own thesis-wide figure counter numbers it instead.

🔢 Table numbering: four cases, and pandoc numbers in only one¶

_tables.substitute (chitragupta/render_output/_tables.py) resolves WRITING-STANDARDS.md §13's two markers -- the  under a caption line, and the inline  -- into whatever the target format can count with. Every row was measured on this host's pandoc 3.1.11.1, because the obvious assumption (pandoc numbers a captioned table) is true in exactly one of them:

Draft	Output	Caption becomes	Reference becomes
`.md`	`tex`, `latex`, `pdf`	`: <caption>\label{tab:<id>}` -- LaTeX counts it	`Table~\ref{tab:<id>}`{=latex}
`.md`	`md`	`Table N: <caption>` -- a paragraph, since this path never reaches pandoc	`Table N`
`.md`	`docx`, `html`, ...	`: Table N: <caption>` -- a real caption carrying a number pandoc will not supply	`Table N`
`.tex`	any	untouched -- the fragment writes `\caption{}\label{}` itself	untouched

Three things in that table are not guessable and cost a render each to find out:

The docx writer numbers nothing. A captioned table round-trips out of .docx as a bare caption paragraph, so the number has to be in the text pandoc is handed.
\label survives a Markdown caption; ~ does not. A raw \label{tab:x} written into a caption line reaches \caption{...\label{tab:x}} intact, but a bare Table~\ref{tab:x} in prose arrives as Table\textasciitilde{}\ref{tab:x} -- pandoc's Markdown reader owns ~ and escapes it. Hence the raw-attribute span in the first row, which is not decoration.
Pandoc has no caption-attribute syntax, so an id cannot ride along in the caption: : Caption {#tbl:x} sets the literal text \{\#tbl:x\}. Nor is pandoc-crossref's @tbl:x available, since citation_gate.py reads a bare @key as a citekey and would fail the gate on tbl.

The substitution order in _substituted is figures, then tables, then mathematics, then equations, and it is not arbitrary: a figure substitution can insert a fenced ASCII block, and _math's displayed-equation rule reads fences -- and equation numbering has to run after mathematics, for the reason the next section states.

🔢 Equation numbering: the one pass that reads what `_math` left behind¶

Issue 457 gives a marked equation the same "author writes no number" contract as a table or figure, via chitragupta/render_output/_equation_captions.py -- but unlike either of those, not every displayed equation gets one: an author opts a specific equation in with  directly above the existing  marker (docs/WRITING-STANDARDS.md §12), and an unmarked block -- a derivation step -- is untouched by every function in this module.

This module runs last, after _math.substitute, not before. A table's or figure's caption sits beside content nothing else touches; an equation's marker sits above content _math.py itself rewrites into real $$...$$. That rewrite only happens on the pandoc path -- render passes an empty mapping on the Markdown-to-Markdown path, so _math.substitute is a no-op there -- which means this module has to recognise two different shapes of the same marked block, keyed on format:

Draft	Output	A marked block becomes	An `equationref` becomes
`.md`	`tex`, `latex`, `pdf`, `docx`, `html`	`\begin{equation}\n<latex>\n\label{eq:<id>}\n\end{equation}` (LaTeX-bound: LaTeX's own counter numbers it) or `Equation N:` above the kept `$$...$$` (docx/html: pandoc numbers nothing outside LaTeX)	`Equation~\ref{eq:<id>}`{=latex} (LaTeX-bound) or `Equation N` (docx/html)
`.md`	`md` (never reaches pandoc)	`Equation N:` above the untouched `<!-- math -->` marker and fence	`Equation N`
`.tex`	any	untouched -- `thesis-chapter-writer` writes `\[...\]`/`$...$` directly and has no marker vocabulary at all	untouched

Because this pass is last, it needs no precomputed declared list handed in from _substituted the way figures do: nothing earlier in the chain moves an equation marker relative to another one, so counting matches in whatever text this module receives agrees with counting them in the pristine draft.

Numbering breaks the "the md path is a no-op" rule, on purpose and only for numbering. A marked equation's content is exactly as untouched on the md path as an unmarked one always was; its number is not -- **Equation N:** is written there the same way **Table N:** already is. python -m chitragupta.draft style (chitragupta/style_equations.py) reports a numbered equation nobody refers to, or an id problem, the same way style_tables.py/ style_figures.py do; it deliberately does not blank fenced code first the way those two do, because an equation's own marked block is itself a fence -- see that module's docstring.

🐛 Known defect: the fourth combination isn't a no-op on this host¶

The fourth row's no-op rests on one assumption: that pandoc, asked to render a .tex fragment to tex/pdf, hands the TikZ straight through to pdflatex untouched. It does not, on pandoc 3.1.11.1 (this host, 2026-08-24) -- and nothing in _with_figures_for or _pandoc_command intercepts it, because the fourth row is coded as "nothing to do here."

_pandoc_command (chitragupta/render_output/_pandoc.py) never passes -f/--from. Without it, pandoc guesses the reader from the input file's extension, and for .tex that guess is the LaTeX reader, not Markdown -- confirmed by reproducing the render directly (not a mock):

$ printf '\\begin{tikzpicture}\\draw[blue] (0,0) circle (1);\\end{tikzpicture}\n' > figures/fig1.tex
$ printf '\\section{Framing}\nPrior work established Y.\n\n\\input{figures/fig1.tex}\n\nText after the figure.\n' > chapter.tex
$ pandoc chapter.tex --standalone -o out.tex; echo "exit=$?"
exit=0

out.tex contains \section{Framing}\label{framing} (the auto-generated \label only the LaTeX reader's auto_identifiers extension produces), Prior work established Y., and Text after the figure. -- the \input is resolved and the tikzpicture environment inside it is gone. No warning, exit 0. This is the same failure mode _substitute_ascii_for_tikz's docstring already names for the .tex→.md path -- pandoc's LaTeX reader drops an environment it doesn't understand -- except that combination has a swap guarding it and this one does not, because _with_figures_for's docstring treats .tex→tex/pdf as the one genuinely inline case needing no substitution. The file on disk is inline; what pandoc's reader does with it before pdflatex ever sees the result is not.

This contradicts thesis-chapter-writer/SKILL.md's own claim (step 9: "--format tex and --format pdf get the TikZ") for any figure that uses \input, which is the shape that skill's own step 9 tells the genre to write. Passing -f latex+raw_tex instead of the bare default reader leaves \input{...} as a raw command rather than resolving it -- confirmed to restore the figure, since pdflatex (with TEXINPUTS already set for the pdf format, chitragupta/render_output/__init__.py) then reads the real file itself. Not applied anywhere in this codebase as of this writing -- flagged here rather than fixed, since fixing it is a separate, scoped change.

🧾 Unbuilt: a natbib-style mode for thesis fragments¶

A change discussed but not built: rendering a .tex fragment's tex/pdf preview with --natbib instead of --citeproc, so the preview defers citation resolution to bibtex the same way the fragment's real, \input-ing thesis eventually will, rather than baking citeproc's own numbering into a document that only ever wants to demonstrate the fragment compiles. --citeproc and --natbib are rival strategies for the same job -- one resolves now and writes a formatted bibliography into the output, the other emits \citep{key} plus \bibliographystyle{}/\bibliography{} for the consuming document's own bibtex to resolve later -- and pandoc accepts both flags together without erroring, silently letting --natbib win. Nothing in this codebase passes --natbib today; _pandoc_command always passes --citeproc, unconditionally, for every format.

Two things worth recording about that unbuilt mode, in case it is picked up later: it would need -f latex+raw_tex-auto_identifiers on the LaTeX reader (the previous section's fix, plus turning off auto_identifiers so a fragment's own \section{Introduction} doesn't collide with another chapter's), and --variable biblio-style=IEEEtran (pandoc's own default under --natbib is plainnat, author-year, which would render this project's one numeric-citation genre in the wrong style; IEEEtran.bst is present on this host at /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/bibtex/bst/ieeetran/). It would also need _swap_manual_refs_for_citeproc (see above) to keep refusing to run under --natbib -- which it already does, since a thesis fragment has no ## References section for section_start to find, but that safety is currently incidental rather than asserted, and a future change wiring --natbib into a genre that does write a References section should make the refusal explicit rather than relying on the same accident.